The Girard-Perregaux Three Bridges | family history
Three parallel bridges oriented vertically across the movement from 6 to 12 o'clock. Girard-Perregaux patented this architecture in 1867 and has never abandoned it. The Three Bridges Tourbillon is the living apex of a movement design that predates the wristwatch by several decades.
Three parallel gold (later titanium) bridges have defined GP's movement architecture since 1867, the most distinctive structural signature in Swiss watchmaking, honored in every generation.
1867-1960s · The Three Bridges patent and pocket-watch era
Constant Girard-Perrin (Girard-Perregaux) patented the Three Gold Bridges architecture in 1867, winning the first prize at the Paris World Exhibition that year. The movement layout places three parallel movement bridges in gold running from 6 o'clock to 12 o'clock across the movement plate, each bridging a different gear train segment. The architecture was designed for a pocket chronometer; the three bridges provide exceptional rigidity and allow the movement to be viewed from the front as a decorative object.
No references from this era in the catalog yet.
1966-1990s · The return of the Three Bridges in wristwatches
Girard-Perregaux revived the Three Bridges architecture in wristwatches in 1966, initially in small production quantities. The revival established the Three Bridges as a collector touchstone: a historical movement architecture brought back in a wristwatch format and exhibited at Basel in increasing prominence through the 1970s and 1980s.
No references from this era in the catalog yet.
1991-present · The Three Bridges Tourbillon
Girard-Perregaux introduced the Three Bridges Tourbillon in 1991, combining the historical bridge architecture with a flying tourbillon visible through the dial. The three bridges (now executed in gold or titanium depending on the reference) run vertically past the tourbillon cage. The movement is displayed through both the dial and the caseback. This is the standard-bearer reference for the Three Bridges architecture in current production.
How to read this family
Two questions for Three Bridges buyers:
- Is the Three Bridges architecture functionally superior to conventional movement layouts? No more than any other well-engineered movement plate. The three-bridge design provides good rigidity and an elegant structural geometry, but it does not inherently outperform a well-made Swiss lever plate in precision terms. The architecture is significant for its historical provenance and aesthetic distinctiveness, not functional superiority.
- How does the Three Bridges Tourbillon compare to other tourbillons in its price range? The Three Bridges Tourbillon competes with tourbillon references from Jaeger-LeCoultre and Vacheron Constantin in the mid-to-upper six-figure range. GP differentiates on movement architecture uniqueness; the vertical three-bridge layout visible through the dial is a stronger visual statement than most conventional tourbillon movements.
Related families: Overseas
References in this family
Which ref to buy
The Three Bridges Tourbillon is GP's apex piece -- the three golden bridge architecture applied to a tourbillon movement. The structural bridges frame the tourbillon cage. This reference has been produced since the 1860s in various iterations and is GP's most important manufacture piece.
- 1Open
Three Bridges Tourbillon -- 150-year movement architecture, tourbillon framed by the structural gold bridges, GP's definitive statement.
- The case for it:
- The Three Bridges Tourbillon is a living horological document. The architecture is 1867 design in continuous production. The tourbillon placement within the bridge structure is architecturally resolved in a way no competitor's tourbillon achieves. As a collector piece, this has genuine historical and technical weight.
- Consider instead if:
- GP tourbillon secondary market lags Patek, AP, and Lange tourbillons at comparable prices. Buyers who want tourbillon investment performance should prioritize those three. GP is the right choice on horological grounds, not financial ones.
Rankings last reviewed 2026-06-07. Editorial perspective only. Not financial advice.