GrailAtlasAn independent reference for mechanical watches

Rolex Cosmograph Daytona (Ceramic Bezel, White) vs Rolex Cosmograph Daytona (Everose, Oysterflex)

Rolex Cosmograph Daytona (Ceramic Bezel, White)
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona (Ceramic Bezel, White)
116500LN
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona (Everose, Oysterflex)
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona (Everose, Oysterflex)
116515LN

Side-by-side at a glance. Click a watch above to open the full reference page.

Rolex 116500LNRolex 116515LN
ModelCosmograph Daytona (Ceramic Bezel, White)Cosmograph Daytona (Everose, Oysterflex)
CaliberRolex Cal. 4130 -- in-house automatic chronograph, 28,800bph, 72h PR, 44j; column-wheel, vertical clutch, integrated construction; no cam-and-lever systemRolex Cal. 4130 -- in-house automatic chronograph, 28,800bph, 72h PR, 44j; column-wheel, vertical clutch, integrated construction; no cam-and-lever system
Case size40mm40mm
Lug-to-lug47mm47mm
Years produced2016–20232011–2023
Brand tierluxuryluxury
Eramodernmodern
Movement tierIn-house manufactureIn-house manufacture
Market median (excellent / full-set)n/an/a
Typical rangen/an/a
Confidencelowlow
Categorieschronograph, sportchronograph, sport
Editorialyesyes
Typical price (2026)$28,000 – $40,000$18,000 – $26,000
Collector noten/abest value: Everose Daytona on Oysterflex is the most wearable Daytona and trades at a meaningful secondary discount to the steel 116500LN, representing better value for buyers indifferent to metal.

Open the Rolex 116500LN reference page →

Open the Rolex 116515LN reference page →

Compare two specific listings (not references) →


Rolex Cosmograph Daytona (Ceramic Bezel, White) vs Rolex Cosmograph Daytona (Everose, Oysterflex) | comparison | Grail Atlas